Raymond Brassier is a member of the philosophy faculty at the American University of Beirut, Alain Badiou, Theoretical Writings, transl. by Ray Brassier & Alberto Toscano (New York: Continuum, ). Jean-Luc Nancy, “Philosophy without. I started to write a review of this but it very quickly reached one and a half pages. But this is really great writing I can totally recommend it. Brassier absolutely. Buy Alien theory: the decline of materialism in the name of matter by Ray Brassier (ISBN:) from Amazon’s Book Store. Everyday low prices and free delivery on.
|Country:||Saint Kitts and Nevis|
|Published (Last):||13 May 2011|
|PDF File Size:||18.26 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||7.6 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
You seem to be interested in a surplus of complexity. This really goes to the heart of the problems of current philosophy and not in any fadish manner.
Also visit my web site – break up with your boyfriend. In any case, Brassier sums up his case for naturalism with this assault on the by now abused phenomenological tenet: Nihilismrealismmaterialismmethodological naturalismantihumanism.
This question was pointless as it was obvious thelry it would all end in 4. My own could be characterized in terms of a new compact between metaphysics and epistemology: In terms of the passages quoted above: Man qua radical immanence without essence is not in question because he is not in philosophy.
He offers an alternative in Nietzsche and Philosophybased on distributions of force and theoory theory of interpretation, where every phenomenon is a symptom of the forces overtaking it active and reactive forces.
Krishna Nair marked it as to-read Jan 19, Noise has no such epistemic valence—it does not yield the sort of cognitive information that provides the basis for true or false judgements; but there is something of fundamental epistemological interest about the way in which it interferes with default cognitive schemas and perceptual Gestalts—epistemological in the sense that it challenges the way in which we relate to experience, rather than operating at the level of the content of experience.
Or one brings Sokal into the mix. Brassierr following passage left me shaking with excitement and filled with relief, feeling as if perhaps the malaise of the primacy of anthropocentricism, culturalism, and the linguistic turn are, at long last, coming to an end and it is becoming possible to philosophize once again without being shackled to the phenomenological condition. Post was not sent – check your email addresses! It should strive to be more than a sop to the pathetic twinge of human self-esteem.
Ray Brassier, Nihil Unbound. Either the philosopher insists that man is de jure irreducible to the natural ontological order investigated by science because the essence of human being is transcendence subjectivity, Spirit, Daseinetc.
Mortal, All Too Mortal: Rastahrasta rated it really liked it Apr 09, Brassier can thus summarize his rejection of this seduction: It turns catastrophe into a resource, ruin into an opportunity, harnessing the uncomputible.
That is, his argument unfolds at the level of philosophemes. Brassier sets up an opposition between perspectives that he takes to play some role in the reproduction of capitalism, on the one hand, and his own position on the other.
Beyond the Marxist analysis of alken dynamics of accumulation, Brassier draws on recent philosophical… Read More. After learning that the world has no intrinsic unity, origin, or purpose, it is only the artist as overman who can reinvest the world with value, and redeem our meaningless suffering. Post-Nihilistic Speculations from Dr. A world in which the well known and the so called lines between mind and body, fantasy and reality, nature and culture, organic and inorganic, life and death, are not just blurred, but have completely disappeared.
However, one common thread running through the new brand of continental positions is a renewed attention to materialist and realist options in philosophy.
Interview With Ray Brassier – Against an Aesthetics of Noise (nY#2)
Itai Farhi marked it as to-read Jun 09, But Brassier timidly reminds us in a footnote that this putative priority granted to subjectivity is usually gratuitously assumed as a pre-conditioning datum for philosophy by conceiving the phenomenon as that which is given to consciousness; the kernel of phenomenological intentionality, but also more broadly what Meillassoux and Brassier will later characterize as the correlationist dogma. So this twofold repetition of the transcendental, as one term inside the relation, and its negative exteriority or purported immanence, composes the structural edification of all idealist negative reintegration of the immanent to the relational field which separates it from transcendence.
That is not to suggest that it is without merit, just that one can certainly engage in naturalism without having to take up these questions just as one can write a history without having to take a detour through physics.
There are many more things to say about Dr. To provide the theoretical scruple requires for consistency becomes the non-philosophical transcendental determination of Decision so that the latter is no longer autonomous or self-positing but relative.
Ray Brassier | SenseLogic
This becomes urgent, since Decision does not allow materialism to operate without the reintroduction of idealism, so it must rethink its conditions to ensure consistency.
He also draws heavily, albeit often negatively, on the work of Gilles DeleuzeEdmund Husserland Martin Heidegger. To put it dramatically, all genuine materialisms are Heraclitan, the posit that all things come to be and pass away in the order of time. He is the author of Difference and Givenness: Notify me of new posts via email.
We will have to forge new vocabularies to be able to say what these things are. Ray — This is a difficult question.
Ray Brassier – Wikipedia
The fact that our best current science will probably turn out be only partly true does not license the conclusion that it is all wrong and that it has no authority whatsoever. Notify me of new comments via email.
Here I think a sober appreciation of the mechanical banality of the processes through which capital reproduces itself might obviate this tendency to mystification: The passage you cite is problematic because it lends itself to such an interpretation.
When I speak of foreseeing consequences: The inevitably rejoinder is then that one is engaging in a pre-critical speculative metaphysics. As such, I follow neither instructions or orders as I am not a caretaker and would kindly ask you not to address me as such. Instead, the idea that the human species might be genetically remodelled in order to make it isomorphic with capital is viewed as a potentially positive outcome of technological developments, and getting involved with this process, rather than lamenting for the lost original meaning of humanity, is for Brassier a political exigency.